Governance & Executive Reporting
Turned distributed projects into an executive decision system
- Annual main initiatives
- 2–5
- Top-priority initiatives
- 1–2
- Resource focus
- Up to 80%
- Decision rights
- 3 tiers
Confirmed from the CEO’s annual direction
Priorities most critical to the year
Business-unit capacity on top priorities
Approval and operating authority by impact
Reframed weekly reporting around the decisions leaders needed to make.
Instead of forwarding every departmental metric and task update, I compressed the picture around executive priorities and the decisions required that week.
Business metrics and project status were reviewed together so changes in performance could be connected to specific execution choices.
Made the full portfolio and sprint plan visible in one place.
When engineering, design, and marketing resources were shared across projects, isolated schedules could not prevent conflicts.
Asana project portfolios and sprint dashboards brought the full project and iteration views together. I coordinated priorities, resources, status, next milestones, cross-team dependencies, and app-review timelines while surfacing delays and risks early.
Clarified who decides what before asking teams to collaborate better.
I introduced DACI to distinguish execution ownership, final approval, expert contribution, and information sharing. The model helped the right person decide at the right time without expanding every meeting.
- Driver owns the execution plan and next action
- Approver confirms the final decision and priority
- Contributors provide expertise and surface risk
- Informed stakeholders receive decisions and changes
A report was the start of the next execution cycle, not the end of a document.
Weekly decisions flowed into iteration plans and team-level execution. Two- and four-week reviews separated observed change from validated hypotheses and informed what to scale, revise, or stop.
The output of PMO is not a report. It is an operating rhythm where better decisions can repeat.







